Criterios de valuación de Startups (Parte 2)

Valuar una startup en estadio temprano resulta muy difícil. Hay muchas señales para tomar en cuenta y procesar, incluso después de analizar cada una de ellas, termina siendo una tarea más artística que científica.

Es cómo valuar una obra de arte: hay algunos criterios que sirven para tomar una decisión con fundamentos pero no hay forma de saber si tomamos la decisión acertada hasta transcurrido un largo tiempo después de haber invertido.

En el artículo anterior mencionamos algunos elementos que pueden servir como ayuda para valuar una startup. En el presente artículo agregaremos nuevos elementos e intentaremos plasmarlos en ejemplos concretos.

A fin de analizar cómo funcionan algunos de los criterios que deberían regir la decisión, haremos el ejercicio de pensar en situaciones hipotéticas que se nos suelen plantear en la práctica. Cada uno de los criterios será analizado de manera absoluta y totalmente independiente al resto, como si fuera el único elemento a considerar.

Equipo fundador

El análisis del equipo fundador es una parte clave del proceso, ya que puede determinar el éxito o el fracaso de una Startup.

Este grupo de personas no solo tienen que ser capaces y contar con las actitudes y aptitudes necesarias, sino que también los valores, la visión y objetivos del proyecto deberían ser similares a los del inversor para asegurar que la línea de desarrollo y crecimiento van en la misma dirección y no existirá un conflicto en la toma de decisiones.

Quiénes son los fundadores?
Cuál es su experiencia en la industria y el mercado del proyecto?
Es comprobable este expertise?
Tienen experiencia los miembros del equipo emprendiendo? Cómo transitaron ese camino y cuál fue el desenlace?
Cuentan con mentores o advisors de renombre?
Son complementarios los perfiles y/o roles del equipo?
Cuántos de los miembros del equipo están dedicados full time al proyecto?

Estas son las preguntas básicas para conocer el equipo y para poder justificar una valuación superior o inferior.

Ejemplo

Un SaaS tiene desarrollado un Producto Mínimo Viable (MVP), no genera ventas y hay un mercado que parece tener potencial pero aún está sin validar. Dos de los founders tienen más de 10 años de experiencia en la industria, sin haber emprendido previamente. Sumado a esto, la compañía está acompañada activamente por un inversor ángel de renombre que ha invertido en la compañía.

Todo esto podría servir para justificar una valuación ligeramente superior a USD 500,000.-

Tracción e ingresos estimados para el corto plazo

En etapas tempranas, la tracción que puede demostrar el proyecto es otro de los puntos importantes.

Siguiendo con el ejemplo de un SaaS, si el proyecto solo cuenta con 3 clientes que realizan una prueba piloto, sin demostrar chances concretas de que se puedan convertir en clientes pagos, será difícil justificar una valuación superior a USD 500,000.-

Sería un caso muy distinto estar hablando de que cuenta con 50 clientes con prueba piloto, el ticket promedio que se le piensa cobrar a cada uno es de USD 1.000.-, y se estima que el 50% de los clientes se convertirán en clientes pagos, se puede empezar a pensar en una valuación más cercana a USD 1.000.000.-

En todo el análisis que se realiza con la tracción y los ingresos estimados en el corto plazo hay variables importantes a tener en cuenta, como lo son la cantidad de potenciales clientes y el ticket promedio. Si hay solamente un cliente y se estima que el ticket del SaaS será de USD 50.000.- mensuales, la valuación podría oscilar entre USD 500.000.- y USD 1.000.000.-, ya que si bien el ingreso esperado es similar al caso anterior, es mucho más riesgoso depender de un solo cliente.

Crecimiento y compromiso de usuarios

Ejemplificamos ahora con un proyecto de Mobile App.

En este caso, contamos con información y conocimiento previo que tenemos de aplicaciones de similares características, sabemos que un típico valor del tiempo de vida promedio de un cliente (LTV – lifetime value) es de USD 2.-

Si la aplicación ya tiene 10.000 usuarios y la base de usuarios está creciendo a un 15% mensual, suena lógico valuar la compañía entre USD 1.000.000.- y USD 1.500.000.-

Si la aplicación tiene 10.000 usuarios y está creciendo a una tasa de 30% mensual, sería razonable aceptar una valuación de entre USD 1.500.000.- y 2.500.000.-

Si la aplicación tiene 10.000 usuarios y la base se está achicando al ritmo de 10% mensual, una valuación razonable podría ser entre USD 750.000.- y USD 1.000.000.-

Tamaño de mercado

Es necesario entender cuál es el mercado potencial al cual apunta el negocio.

El proyecto puede apuntar a:

Un país
La región
Al continente
Todo el mundo

Conviene analizar ese mercado potencial con el sistema “TAM, SAM, SOM”, el cual analiza 3 aspectos que funcionan como embudo, desde lo más genérico hasta lo más específico:

mercado total direccionable;
mercado al que puede servir el proyecto con su producto o servicio;
mercado que razonablemente puede conseguir el proyecto.

Un aspecto interesante a tener en cuenta es el plazo estimado para atacar el mercado al que se apunta y la hoja de ruta. Es importante saber si los fondos de la actual ronda de financiamiento son suficientes para atacar el mercado potencial y, sino, cuantas más rondas de financiamiento se planean llevar a cabo, y en qué plazos estimados.

También es imprescindible consultar si la actual ronda de financiamiento en la que participamos como inversores, nos da el derecho a participar en la compañía global, o solamente en alguno de los países.

El tamaño de mercado resulta un factor determinante en compañías de etapa temprana, ya que al haber tanta incertidumbre sobre la mayoría de los aspectos del proyecto, funciona como principal indicador del potencial de crecimiento del negocio, el cual debe poder generar ingresos de crecimiento exponencial y retornos significativos para una inversión con este nivel de riesgo asociado.

Cuando el emprendedor hace su pitch, es conveniente analizar si hay una coherencia lógica entre el mercado que él declara como potencial, el segmento de clientes al que apunta, la propuesta de valor orientada a resolver un problema que ese segmento padece, y la estrategia de comunicación y marketing que planea llevar a cabo para aumentar sus ingresos.

Si la respuesta a todos estos puntos suena satisfactoria y atractiva, una valuación de USD 1.000.000.- podría resultar lógica, aun cuando el producto y estadio comercial se encuentren todavía muy incipientes.

Competencia

Este tema está estrechamente vinculado al anterior ya que, si existe competencia directa, la compañía en cuestión tendrá la dura tarea de competir por el mercado existente o diferenciarse para escaparse de su competencia con alguna ventaja competitiva o propuesta de valor superadora.

Un error en el que incurren muchos proyectos es el de subestimar a los jugadores incipientes de la industria y a quienes consideran como competencia indirecta. Estos competidores podrán superar fácilmente con una mera innovación incremental y escalar rápidamente en la curva de madurez del mercado en que nos encontremos.

Asimismo, aunque la compañía que estemos analizando corra con una ventaja competitiva sustancial, debemos consultar el camino a seguir en términos de innovación y los nuevos negocios que puedan llegar a surgir. No es grave si el emprendedor no tiene la respuesta inmediata, pero sí resulta determinante que el equipo transmita un perfil de innovación permanente, esto es lo que forjará una compañía que pueda trascender y sobrevivir.

Tanto este punto como el anterior, nos permiten conocer la cuota de mercado que apunta obtener el proyecto.

Modelo de negocio

En nuestra opinión, este es uno de los aspectos más relevantes para la correcta ejecución del plan de negocios. Si existe una propuesta de valor consistente y un mercado potencial atractivo, entonces debemos analizar si el modelo de negocio es viable, coherente con el segmento de cliente al que se apunta, con el contexto socio económico y, sobre todo, si es escalable para generar el tipo de retornos que esperamos en este tipo de inversiones.

Es fundamental, antes de adentrarse en detalles, distinguir si es un modelo B2B, B2C, B2G, etc. Esto nos permitirá identificar con claridad quiénes son los usuarios y quiénes son los clientes (los que pagan), así como también cuáles son los canales de venta, cómo son los procesos de venta, los obstáculos que se presentaran, y corroborar si la estrategia de comunicación, precio y producto son coherentes.

Además, la distinción entre estas categorías resulta útil como indicio para analizar la potencialidad de que la compañía sea posteriormente invertida por fondos institucionales o eventualmente adquirida por una corporación, lo que seguramente nos dará una clara posibilidad de generar un evento de liquidez en nuestra inversión en los próximos años. Por ejemplo, existen fondos que excluyen de su tesis de inversión a los proyectos con foco B2G y B2C.

Otro aspecto muy útil de conocer el tipo de negocio es que nos puede indicar cuánto capital y que tan intensivo sería el uso del mismo, cuál es su velocidad de gastos y flujo proyectado y, consecuentemente, cómo serán las próximas rondas de financiamiento.

Por ejemplo, cualquier modelo similar a una red social cuyo objetivo es generar trafico masivo para luego monetizarlo con publicidad, seguramente deberá invertir en adquisición de usuarios y fidelización durante un largo periodo de tiempo para lograr empezar a generar ganancias con el producto o servicio. Tardará incluso más años o meses en lograr el punto de equilibrio operativo.

Otros ejemplos pueden ser compañías que necesiten alto nivel de inversión, ya sea para inventarios, almacenamiento, capital de trabajo, o mismo compañías que, por el perfil de sus clientes, deben transitar largos procesos de venta para ver sus primeros ingresos.

Existen innumerables ejemplos, pero lo importante es no dejar este aspecto al azar.

Estructura de capital

Si bien no es sustancial al éxito del negocio, es importante conocer la estructura de capital (cap table) de la compañía, y conocer cuáles son las obligaciones, pasivos y contingencias asumidas por la compañía y/o los emprendedores a nivel individual.

Asimismo, debemos conocer los términos bajo los cuales han invertido inversores anteriores. Todo ello nos dará una idea más clara sobre el tipo de derechos que podemos llegar a adquirir en caso de decidir avanzar con una inversión, y las potenciales trabas o riesgos que podrán surgir en caso de que la compañía resulte exitosa.Dedicaremos un artículo para este aspecto.

Como habrán notado, ninguno de estos criterios o aspectos sirve por sí solo para asignar una valuación a una compañía, pero poco a poco vamos obteniendo parámetros útiles para aproximarnos a una valuación más exacta y acertada a la realidad del proyecto.

A lo largo de los próximos artículos, intentaremos desarrollar un mecanismo lo más estandarizado y acertado posible.

Struggles of Entrepreneurs Based on Investors’ Perception

The first quarter of 2017 was closed with a total financing of $27 billion worldwide and the hot sectors in the world of Venture Capital (VC) have been fintech and technology. Despite the booming industry, VC has its own ups and downs.

Overlooking Entrepreneurs

Innovation has always been at the heart of the United States and the country has always encouraged entrepreneurship, yet, the ideas are often overlooked when it comes to immigrants and women in the sector.

Jerry Nemorin, the founder of LendStreet, is a fine example of that case. He initiated a company to support individuals who find it difficult to pay off their debt. He looks for people who are struggling with loan repayments, buy and consolidate their debt and refinance it at a fair rate of interest. Despite such a brilliant idea, he struggled with raising funds. According to him, investors recognize a defined pattern and the chances of funding the idea of a black person who is out to solve poor people’s problem are very low.

However, he is not alone. There are a large number of entrepreneurs with brilliant ideas who have been struggling with raising funds. Less than 1% investment in new startups goes to people of color, whereas, 10% investment goes to female entrepreneurs. Only 15% of the Unicorns that are making over $200 billion have made it to the real-world industries for day to day dealings.

Blind Spots – Another Cause Behind the Struggles

In an economy that promotes innovation, a lot of the best ideas are left out of the conversation due to blind spots.

Bias

Bias is the first blind spot that they face. Although, investors don’t do that intentionally, yet, it happens. Investors tend to invest in the ideas that come from people like them.

A study was conducted by the National Bureau of Economic Research in which it was identified that applications that read ‘Greg’ got more calls as compared to the résumés that had the word ‘Lakisha’. This is not surprising, because only 5 percent of the partners in VC firms are female, whereas, people of colors are significantly lesser than that, i.e., less than 1 percent. Hence, the distribution of funding is largely based on the decision makers who are investors in this case.

Availability Bias

This is another blind spot that comes in the way of funding the brilliant ideas. Investors tend to invest in the ideas that are closest to them, or the last good idea they heard, versus the best. Almost 80 percent of the money goes to the firms that are situated within 30 miles of the investors.

Two-way Thinking

Lastly, most investors have two-way thinking when it comes to funding the ideas. Many people believe that they should focus on making a profit from a business, regardless of whether it is good or bad for the society at large, while engaging in philanthropy and nonprofit activities for the benefit of the society without paying much heed to financial sustainability.

Jerry’s idea supports this ideology, i.e., making a profit from a business that helps people in paying off their loan.

Overcoming the Blind Spots

Although, these blind spots are deep-rooted, yet, people can overcome these obstacles if they make an intentional effort to welcome new ideas. Kapor Capital intentionally invested in LendStreet to support Jerry’s idea. As a result, an initial investment of $500,000 turned into a portfolio of 40 million dollars, which enabled Jerry to refinance the financial statements of thousands of families in the U.S.

These ideas are available in abundance, but investors have to look closely and more carefully to fund new startups based on the merit so as to reap substantial benefits.

ICOs Surpassed Early Stage Venture Capital Funding

New startups that raised funds through Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) have now surpassed the early stage VC Funding for internet firms.

But before diving into it, it is important to know what ICOs are.

What is Initial Coin Offerings?

This is another way of raising cash.

Cryptocurrency and blockchain startup companies raise capital through ICOs by selling tokens of investors in exchange for equity funds. It is somewhat the same as Initial Public Offering in which stocks are issued in exchange for equity. Just like crowdfunding, ICOs provide a way to get funds from users by enabling them to have a share of the business. They get digital currency in exchange for the money they invest in the business.

Rising Popularity of ICOs and VC Funding

ICOs have gained massive popularity in the last few months among blockchain and cryptocurrency startups. In April this year, the total capital raised via these offerings was around $100 million and in May, the amount went up to about $250 million. The month of June turned out to be the biggest surprise when the total funding exceeded $550 million. According to Goldman Sachs, it was the first time that it performed better than seed and angel venture capital funding. Early stage and angel venture capital funding was less than $300 million in June.

In July, the offerings were a little more than $300 million, whereas, early stage and angel funding was just a bit higher than $200 million.

Popularity Among the Celebrities

ICOs have become so popular that even the celebrities, including Paris Hilton and Floyd Mayweather, have started jumping on board. In fact, Paris has been involved in it for over a year now and also met the COO of Ethereum last year.

Total Value of ICOs in 2017

The total value raised by 92 ICOs in 2017 is $1.25 billion. This is a really good number, given the recent boom of such offerings in the VC sector. There are so many firms that have used these offerings to raise money. For example, Tezos managed to get the capital of over $200 million by creating a new blockchain, whereas, another firm, Bancor secured $153 million via ICO.

Criticism and Scrutiny from Regulators

Despite the boom, this phenomenon has been under severe criticism and scrutiny from regulators and other authorities. For example, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) released a statement in which it was mentioned that these offerings are exposed to money laundering and other terrorist financing risks, because the nature of these transactions remains anonymous. Another concern raised by the MAS was the collection of large amounts of capital in such a short time frame, which makes ICO vulnerable to high-level risk.

On the other hand, the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) said in July this year that the security law of the U.S. will be applicable to this cryptocurrency. The experts are also showing concern over its legitimacy. They have highlighted that the sale of a cryptographic token makes the investor entitled to a certain share of profit in the firm, which can be considered as a violation of financial rules and regulations. The People’s Bank of China and a lot of other government departments have released a joint statement that people and firms that have raised money through ICO should also make arrangements to return that capital.

Firms Facing Increasing Risk of Getting Hacked

Despite all the boom and criticism, the risk of ICOs cannot be ruled out. A clear example of this is CoinDash that initiated an ICO, but ended up getting hacked in July. As a result, all of its funds got stolen. Although, it has gained popularity in the past few months, yet, the risks cannot be ruled out entirely.

Future of ICOs

The Chief Information Officer of UBS, Oliver Bussman, raised his concern and said that strict regulations and measures, as applied to IPO businesses, are required in ICO to safeguard the interest of investors. However, he is quite confident about this new mode of raising funds and expressed that such offerings will continue to happen in future. He said that as a new business model that is benefiting the blockchain technology, ICO will continue to sustain by combining hybrid equity ownership/currency and crowd funding.

Women Still Struggling in the World of Technology and Innovation

Although, it seems as if things are moving in a positive direction for female entrepreneurs, there is yet a lot to be done. Women have made accomplishment in every field, but they are still facing a number of challenges, especially when you talk about the increasing number of female startup owners and their ability to get funding.

David S. Ricketts, the senior innovation scholar at the Technology and Entrepreneurship Center at Harvard, said that this is the number one challenge they face when their businesses are experiencing growth.

Challenges Faced by Women Entrepreneurs in the IT Sector

Female owners of IT companies have to come across various obstacles when they try to raise capital from venture capital firms. This holds true in case of the Silicon Valley and tech hubs in Amsterdam, Berlin, London. Not only does it adversely affect the progress of women entrepreneurs, but it is also bad for the technology sector, because restraining their leadership and talent hampers the overall growth and impede innovation. Moreover, the gender gap is rapidly increasing around the world, with 90 percent of the venture capital going to male entrepreneurs and only 10 percent retained by female founders. In addition to that, only 10 percent of the strategic level positions in tech companies are occupied by women.

According to the report by the National Women’s Business Council, women invest half the amount of capital invested by men in the startup businesses. It was further mentioned in the report that firms with female founders usually get far less equity financing from venture capitalists and angel investors as compared to companies with male owners, i.e., 14.4 percent vs. 3.6 percent.

Furthermore, only 1.8 percent of the women ask their close family or friends to raise capital as opposed to 9.2 percent men.

Female Entrepreneurs in the European Market

A similar trend has been observed in the European market as well, wherein, the IT sector is on the boom, yet the percentage of women leaders is a lot less as compared to men and only a small percentage of venture capital is allocated to startups led by female entrepreneurs. The United Kingdom (UK) is the second biggest startup hub after Berlin. 86 percent of the startups in the UK that receive venture capital funds are owned by men. Whereas, the percentage of angel investment secured by men and women is 56 percent and 44 percent respectively. Unfortunately, even in the IT sector, the distribution of capital is not based on merit.

With such funding constraints, women owned startups in the UK only represent 15 percent of the entire sector. They either revert to self-funding or seek crowdfunding opportunities to survive in the long run.

Female Entrepreneurs Generate More Revenue than Male Founders

It is worth noting that female owner companies earn 12 percent more revenue as compared to companies run by men in the IT industry, and their return on investment is 35 percent higher than the firms owned by their male counterparts. If they are given appropriate support, not only do they give better performance, but also make exceptional achievements. This holds true for women living in any part of the world.

How Can Female Entrepreneurs Contribute to Better and Sound Economy?

According to one estimate, if women in the UK, who wants to have their own startup companies, get the right support, they can instantly generate more than 300,000 new businesses and create more than 400,000 employment opportunities. Moreover, female-led businesses can contribute to innovation and better quality products with great consumer satisfaction.

The U.S. Firms, such as Backstage Capital and Kapor Capital, and the UK firms like Albright are some of the prominent examples of women-led capital firms that have proven to be the game changers in the venture capital (VC) community. To let the innovative and productive ideas flowing in the IT market, VCs should open the doors to give female-led companies a head-start, because it is possible that the owner of the next big unicorn is a female entrepreneur.

European Startups Seeking Assistance of Family Office Investors

There have been a number of stories about the connection between family offices and startups. Family offices are basically private wealth management instruments that are formed by rich families. There are a lot of venture capital companies that established their worth through family offices, including Greylock Partners, Bessemer Venture Partners, Atomico, and Frog Capital.

There are so many well-off families that have built their empires via entrepreneurship or by making seed stage investment.

Rising Trend of Family Offices in Venture Capital

It has been estimated that family offices around the world have $4 trillion worth of capital available for investment purposes. Moreover, there has been a rising trend of family offices in the world of venture capital.

An increased appetite for venture capital has been found among these investors. Interviews with 300 family offices around the globe, revealed that 70% of them were either actively investing in the startups or assessing the investment exposure to technology VC. However, there is another group of investors who had mixed reviews. They were still in the process of either recovering from a sudden shock or were still unsure of how to go about investing in startups effectively.

Consequences for Europe’s Tech World

Venture capital firms in Europe have experienced a huge funding gap with the United States. There are more technology companies in Europe as compared to the United States with high production of developers, yet, startups in the European region only receive a small percentage of investment in relation to their United States counterparts. Unless there is an improvement in this section, Europe will always lag behind in the production of tech unicorns and famous brands like Google or Apple.

Apart from large companies, family offices that currently have $759 million in asset under management should also contribute in bridging this gap.

Higher Returns

If you look at it from a startup or venture capitalist’s perspective, the involvement of family offices is not a big deal. Having relatively relaxed procedures, family office investors have created a stronger network as compared to institutional investors with an ability to open more avenues effectively.

It is totally understandable if you look at it from another angle. For example, family offices always look for those investment opportunities that offer a higher return. They are moving toward riskier products that offer high yield, such as a venture capital opportunity to grab prospective profitable investments.

Moreover, there was a research where it was pointed out that those who are taking control of family offices have a natural inclination and a better understanding of small scale businesses in the technology industry with ground breaking and innovative business models.

Changing Perception

It is true that family offices alone cannot bridge the funding gap of Europe as it requires an alliance between city or national level governments, institutional investors, angel investors, and corporate sector alongside the richest families in the world. However, it is not easily possible as it calls for a shift in perception toward venture capital, especially in Europe because it is still far behind the United States in terms of progress.

On the opposite side of the Atlantic, there is a high inclination toward taking huge risks. It is beneficial in the long run, because venture capital generates value much higher than the basic investment. In America, everyone knows that talented entrepreneurs who couldn’t make it in the first attempt are actually winners in the making, who will definitely make it big next time. Unlike America where failure is considered a stepping stone, Europe takes it as a stigma, which eventually influences their decision of capital allocation.

With the rise of technology startups in Europe, risk attitude is gradually changing among private as well as institutional investors. It is highly likely that family offices will be investing in the next wave of European innovation and research and development. This leads to increase in the number of startups that will get to the point of escape velocity and will also thrive at growth stage and beyond.

If the tech momentum in the European market does not die down, family offices should make a heavy investment into venture capital or else it will be left behind from other regions as well, such as Asia.

Angel Investors & Friends and Family – The Key Source of Funding

Investing in startups is a challenging task. Some startups make big promises, but end up failing, while others turn out to be quite a success. For example, the early investors of Instagram got more than 300 times return on their initial investment within a period of two years. But these are one of the mega jackpots. On many occasions, investors suffered heavy losses as well. This is the reason why they are wary of investing in startups.

However, it has been observed that the key sources of funding for a startup are either angel investors or their family and friends.

Friends and Family as a Key Source of Funding

According to a survey, friends and family invest more than $60 billion every year. Moreover, around 38 percent of the startup owners gather funds from their kith and kin and the average investment value is around $23,000.

There is no better way to raise money than to seek the help of your own family members or friends. They can be an ideal option to give your business a head start. If you have reliable family members who are willing to invest, it can be a valuable resource and a long-term opportunity, especially because their main motivation will be to provide support and show loyalty toward the founder rather than expecting a high return on investment.

It is basically a close circle of those individuals who have a strong affinity with your brand or with you.

However, it is very important that these investments are officially set down in writing. All the documentation should be signed by the investors with their consent to the fact that there is a risk that they might not get their cash back.

What is the Risk Involved?

It is crucial to know that business should not be mixed with pleasure. Taking money from friends and family is a huge responsibility and risky at the same time. Make sure you share a strong bond with them so that your goals do not get affected when things go wrong. By accepting the funds provided by the family members or friends to start your business, you risk their money. Therefore, it is of vital importance that all parties come to a consensus before anything is initiated.

To manage and control the risk, every party should sign a promissory note that contains repayment terms. In case, your friends or family members want to partner with you, sign a partnership agreement and keep the official documents with you.

Angel Investors as a Key Source of Funding

According to a report, more than 268,000 angel investors are active in the United States. Every year, they make an investment of 20 billion dollars in around 60,000 businesses. The average investment amount is approximately $75,000. As per the Angel Resource Institute database, in 2012, the recorded number of angel groups in the U.S. was 385.

Angel investor is an affluent person who provides funds for startup companies, mostly in exchange for equity ownership or convertible debt instruments. A lot of these individuals are either business professionals, higher-ups in the corporate sector, or renowned entrepreneurs. Similarly, there are angel groups as well that consist of individual angels who come together for a common goal, i.e., to evaluate and fund the startup companies. These groups allow such investors to pool their money and make larger investments.

Benefits of Having Angel Investors as a Source of Funding the Business

They are usually the ideal source to fulfill funding requirements, because they are focused on the healthy growth of a startup company. Moreover, they also contribute as a coach or mentor based on their own experiences. For example, angel investors introduce startup founders to prospective investors and potential clients. They also identify the problems, advise solutions, and help these businesses to get recognition and credibility in the market. All in all, angels take a lot more risk as compared to other institutional investors. This is the reason why they are so dedicated and seriously concerned about the profits and losses of their portfolio companies.

To summarize, there has been a rising trend of getting funds from angel investors or family and friends, as they have not only been beneficial to fuel the startups, but have also contributed toward a better economy around the globe.

Israel Government and Venture Capital

The government of Israel has actively participated in the development of Israeli Venture Capital (VC) market through hybrid financing, i.e., a mix of private and public VC funds. This was done to gain the maximum advantage of private funds from foreign investors.

Formation of the YOZMA Group – Initiative of the Israeli Government

The government has continually faced the challenge in Israeli VC policies on how they can deal with a small size of their domestic market and limited availability of funds. In order to tackle this issue, the Israeli government created the YOZMA Group in the early 90s. This program followed the U.S. style VC operations. Although, it carried tax breaks and equity guarantees for foreign investors, yet, there were not enough incentives for local investors.

YOZMA group was formed in 1993 with the infusion of 100 million U.S. dollars that was supplied by the Israeli government. It is basically a VC fund that invests in high-tech startups. During the next three years after its formation, the group created a total of ten hybrid funds. The second fund was launched in 1995 with the backing of European, American and Israeli investors. Each of these funds was financed with approximately 20 million U.S dollars.

Alongside these initiatives, YOZMA was also involved in new startups, which gave rise to a professionally managed VC market in Israel. The group turned out to be a catalyst for development and growth of the VC sector in Israel. Companies at any stage of development could receive funds from the group, but its primary focus is to invest in early stage companies that target high potential companies in biotechnology and life science sectors.

YOZMA III CEO Club – Initiative of the YOZMA Group

The group also developed professional relations with a number of well-known academic institutions and IT incubators in the country. Some of the companies in the YOZMA portfolio directly arose from these institutions. With the aim to involve executives at a senior position and founders of successful firms in YOZMA’s activities, a group was formed called YOZMA III CEO Club. This group turned out to be a great success and was a valuable source of a number of investment opportunities available at a particular point in time to companies or investors.

Privatization of YOZMA and New Challenges Faced by the Government

The late 90s, the government took a decision to privatize the YOZMA group as it believed that the private sector was adequately strong and healthy. The Israeli government auctioned its direct co-investments in 14 organizations. It also sold away its interest in 9 YOZMA funds to its partners. Although, the state still holds a small interest in two YOZMA funds, yet, all the funds are privatized and the direct contribution of YOZMA related VC capital has largely declined.

Other Initiatives by the Government to Improve VC Sector

The Israeli government also undertook a number of other initiatives, including the launch of tax incentive schemes for investors, fostering the international research and development, and development of other programs.

Tax Incentives for International Business Angels

According to a research paper by Günseli Baygan, a large number of Israeli VC funds are believed to be injected by business angels in Israel and other countries, specifically the U.S. The government offered tax incentives along with other programs to connect small enterprises and VC funds with international institutions and multinational companies.

Many of the VC funds started their offices in the U.S. and Europe to provide assistance to portfolio companies in finding investors and bringing awareness of technological and market developments in the international market. Given the small scale of the local market, it was a great move to flourish VC firms.

Fostering International Research and Development (R&D) Agreements

The government also fostered international R&D agreements, including the Israel-US Binational Industrial R&D (BIRD) foundation and the US-Israeli Science and Technology Commission. The BIRD was established in the 70s to fund R&D in startup companies. Moreover, it has also made a contribution by working alongside VC community, making its matchmaking services available for their portfolio companies in order to find out the business angels.

Other Programs

Apart from the above mentioned initiatives, different government bodies, including the Export Institute in Israel, MATIMOP – an Israeli Industry Center for R&D, and MESSER – Israeli Idea Promotion Center, made their contributions by offering assistance to small firms and entrepreneurs in assessing local and foreign markets for launching their services and products.

The VC industry in Israel grew from an investment of $440 million in 1997 to $1,759 billion in 2007, and almost all the investments in the country focus on high-tech companies, including bio-technology and ICT.

UK Government and Venture Capital

New startup have a potential for high growth, and these businesses have been emerging at a fast pace since the recession of 2008. However, the success of these companies is based on a number of factors, one of which is the availability of an appropriate source of business finance. Due to the credit crunch, new businesses suffered a lot in the UK in terms of getting finance. Therefore, it was important to rehabilitate the economy of the United Kingdom by encouraging alternate sources of investments, such as, Private Equity or Venture Capital funds.

The main challenge faced by the government of the UK was not to create high-growth firms, but to take measures in order to ensure continued growth of these companies. Innovative ideas can only thrive if the right investment opportunity is available. The businesses with a potential of high-growth need a substantial amount of funds up-front, which is hard to obtain via traditional sources of finance.

Rise of Business Angels in the UK

Right after the credit crunch, business angel network evolved in the UK and took the form of well-structured and organized groups of professionals. It allowed them to make significant initial investments and undertake subsequent investments in the same professional way as Venture Capital investors do. However, the Venture Capital funding system was not established and focused on investing in innovative ideas, but it began to change.

The UK Government Support for Venture Capital Investment

Inspired by the Venture Capital (VC) backed firms in the United States, economists and authorities in the UK showed rising interest in this alternate investment opportunity for its unique role in distributing resources and expertise to a small percentage of high potential businesses.

Every major economy in the world has implemented initiatives to promote the role of VC, and many governments have formed their own VC funds. Similarly, the UK government has established various hybrid VC funds to achieve the entrepreneurial objectives and bridge the equity gap by strengthening the VC ecosystem. The purpose of these funds is to focus on growth oriented startup firms with innovative ideas that continue to face difficulties in obtaining capital. The UK government has a history of such interventions in a financial market that goes back to 1945 the Industrial and Commercial Finance Corporation (ICFC) was formed for SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprises).

The Government VC Funds (GVCFs)

There are three main GVCFs operating in the UK, namely UK Innovation Investment Fund (UKIIF), Enterprise Capital Funds (ECF), and Angel Co-investment Fund (ACF). All of these are the hybrid co-investment schemes and their aim is to promote public-private sector investment.

UK Innovation Investment Fund (UKIIF) – It was established in 2010 to encourage VC investment in the Research and Development sectors. It supports the formation of viable investment capital and targets the high-potential IT businesses in the UK. The investment is made via two underlying funds, i.e., the UK Future Technology Fund (now ceased) and the Hermes Environmental Impact Fund. These funds invest in those VC funds that are involved in giving capital to strategically crucial sectors of the UK, such as, life sciences, digital technologies, advanced manufacturing, or clean technology.
Enterprise Capital Funds (ECF) – This fund started operating in 2006. It represents a combination of private and public investments in businesses that have a tendency of high-growth. The purpose of establishing this fund was to lower the entry barrier for fund managers to operate in the VC ecosystem as well as to increase the supply of equity in the region where small businesses do not have access to the growth capital. It is rolling a program of 19 funds around £840 million with a planned life-cycle of ten to twelve years.
Angel Co-investment Fund (ACF) – It is the UK government’s £100 million fund that was launched in 2011. The objective of this fund is to provide direct investment to SMEs with high growth potential and to support the UK business angel market. Under this scheme, funds are allocated across the UK with a goal to support companies at every stage of development in different sectors. Furthermore, it operates at an arm’s length from the UK government under the administration of the British Business Bank.

Government interventions have become more important with the rapidly changing business environment and more initiatives are required to be taken by the government to promote the innovative ideas in the country to boost the overall economic environment.

Angels going back to heaven

The global market is at its all times high and businesses are getting investments in abundance.

Angel investments have also stepped up their game. In the past few years, a number of deals took place where the investments from angel investors flooded in, for example, Reid Hoffman, who made an investment in Facebook and Flickr, whereas, Chris Sacca invested in Instagram and Twitter. You would find so many names behind the companies who made it big in a short period of time, such as Friendster, Yelp, Twitter, etc.

Business Cycles leading the Angel Cycle

Most of the startups in the tech-industry have been backed by contributions made by angel investors, but the question is:

How long will it last?

This question has been brewing for quite some time, and there is a reason behind it.

If you take a look at past three decades, you will find out that angel cycle followed the same pattern as a business cycle. With the boom and bust experienced by the business cycle, angels took exits and departed to safe haven from time to time. There has been a total of five distinct cycles over a period of the last thirty-one years, depicting the rise and fall of silicon valley’s angel investors.

The sine curve that keeps track of fluctuations in the angel cycle typically follows the sine curve that keeps track of ups and down in a wider business cycle. It shows that as angel investing begins to rise up, the remaining startup investment market would be going through a radical shift.

Rise of Angels in Past 5 Years

For the past six years, the size of an average investment made by angels grew almost sixty percent, and pre-money valuation has shown a growth of around twenty percent.

Angels have invested heavily in the valley, wherein, different groups of angels have infused a lot of cash as the rounds got bigger and bigger each time. For example, two years ago in 2014, an investment of more than $24 billion was made by angel investors.

As they were risky investments, they hardly took into account more than 10 percent of an angel’s portfolio. Most of these investment decisions were discretionary; this is the reason why appetite of these investors and available funds got exhausted due to uncertain market conditions.

If the Cycle is about to Mature?

As predicted by Bill Gurley, a venture capitalist in the Silicon Valley, the cycle is about to reach its maturity growth is given more value as compared to making profits. Regardless of whether it is happening, when it eventually happens, angel investors will become more cautious, wherein, some of them would wait for the market to go back to where it was prior to the fall, while others would simply pack up and leave.

History Repeats Itself

If you look back in the past, angel investors flee from the recession that occurred in the beginning of 1980s, only to enter the market again with the introduction of PCs and record high job opportunities coupled with the surge in the real estate market in San Francisco. Another downfall of angel cycle was observed with the economic recession of the 90s, as they made an even dramatic comeback later on with the growth of the dot – com bubble. Right after the bubble was burst in 2000, not only did they leave the tables once again, the investments turned out to be a failure as well.

They made another comeback after that, but escaped to safe havens when the real recession hit the market in 2007. Since then, the industry has experienced bullish trends, but no one knows when it will come to an end. However, the only certainty on the basis of past events is that it will come to an end.

If Time for Startups is Now?

If you have a startup company or planning to raise capital for funding your idea, it is better to raise capital now. Try to attract as much funds today as you can, while the market is experiencing a boom, because when the business cycle takes a shift, angels will take a step back. In times of good market conditions, business cycles are considered perpetual. What businesses tend to forget is, it is a cycle that goes through a series of surges and plunges. The global economy is not immune to the unavoidable macro events, as their occurrence gradually causes the shift in business cycles.

How Smart Angels Invest? – A Guide to Creating Your Investment Strategy

Investing in a startup has become more of a trend recently as it promises to return more than what it’s originally worth if it becomes successful. Some of the startups that made it big include Uber, Facebook, and Twitter. If you believe that you have enough capital to invest in the startups, but don’t know how to begin and what strategic direction to choose, it is better to start by analyzing the strategies of smart and successful angels; the type of investments they have in their portfolio and the course of their invested money over a period of time.

It may take some time to master the skills of these angel investors, but don’t get disheartened by it because it will eventually be brought to fruition as you learn to take the right decision. Even the successful investors made plenty of mistakes before they reached this position. Following are some of the things some of the well-known angel investors believe in when they make seed-stage investments.

Investing in People

One of the most famous angel investors of today is Ron Conway, who has made an investment in a number of successful ideas in the past decade. According to him, the most crucial element to consider when you invest in a startup is its team. He said that the idea of an entrepreneur changes and evolve with the passage of time, therefore, it is important to invest in people.

He follows a common strategy called spray and pray by making a large number of small investments. Not every investment made by him guarantees a successful exit, but he certainly has a huge network with different types of investors who look forward to joining the league of these angels.

Capital Efficient Business Idea

Another successful angel investor, Reid Hoffman, who is also a founder of LinkedIn and has made an investment in Flickr, Facebook, etc., believes in innovative ideas that have a tendency to scale efficiently. Whenever he invests in a company, he looks for a product that is unique, has the potential to attract millions of users, and most of all, it can attract funding as a business grows.

Identify the Products that Appeal Consumers

Chris Sacca, an angel investor who has invested in Instagram and Twitter, looks for a product that will be in demand once it hits the market. An example can be his investment in Turntable.fm, in which he invested a lot of time, because he realized it in the beginning that users would become engaged in this investment.

Team Involved in Materializing the Idea

Another well-known name in the angel investors’ community is Chris Dixon, a co-founder of Hunch. He invested in Skype and Milo. Moreover, in 2010, he was ranked number 1 investor in Businessweek. Although, he is always on a hunt for high-tech startups, yet he believes in diversifying away from the risk, and so also invest in startups that do not fall in the category of high-tech. However, apart from the technology, he focuses on the team involved in bringing an idea to reality, and this, he believes, is a crucial part of his investment. He said that as environmental changes occur, the shortcomings in the original idea start popping up. A good entrepreneur would always adjust to the changing environment, which can only be seen through the passion of the team involved.

Reasonable Compensation

Everyone must’ve heard the word PayPal; its co-founder who also invested in Facebook, Yelp, LinkedIn, and Friendster, Peter Thiel, said that he keeps his focus on what a CEO is paid. If these people are being paid a lot of money in the company, the chances of an investment to run out quickly are very high, but if the CEO is paid less than average, it depicts the alignment of his interest with equity shareholders. Therefore, he sees how reasonable a compensation is in the company when he invests.

Provides Solution to the Problem

A famous celebrity, Ashton Kutcher, has only been on the field for four years, yet, he has made substantial investments in high profile companies, such as, Skype, Zaarly, Flipboard, AirBnB, etc.

According to him, what he looks for in a company is the tendency of its product to solve a problem, and the user it engages who demand that solution.

To summarize, whenever you plan to invest in a company, you can choose one or use a blend of these ideas in order to examine factors that may lead to finding a successful deal. All in all, what they focus on is the entrepreneur; the team he assembles, and the idea he represents that determines whether an investment would be profitable or not.